Highlights

Forthcoming Publications

image1

Van rechtsbescherming naar machtsbescherming
A.Q.C. Tak

Op 8 februari 2019 werd door een vijfhonderdkoppige ‘crème de la crème’ van de Nederlandse bestuursrechtspraak (rechters, bewindslieden, wetenschappers en andere politici) tijdens een ongekende lustrumviering op de Haagse Campus van de Leidse Universiteit jubilerend het glas geheven op het 25-jarig jubileum van deze rechtspraak onder de Awb, de Algemene wet bestuursrecht.   In dit boek wordt het werkelijke beeld van de Nederlandse bestuursrechtspraak anno 2019 getoond. De auteur heeft dit beeld geaccentueerd door de titel van deze laatste druk te wijzigen in ‘Van rechtsbescherming naar machtsbescherming’.   In deze laatste druk wordt het volledige en ware beeld van de Nederlandse bestuursrechtspraak van haar blinddoek ontdaan, met volledige herschrijving en her-ordening van het (immense) materiaal anno 2019, en treft men bijwerking aan van alle nieuwe wetgeving, jurisprudentie en literatuur.   A.Q.C. (Twan) Tak (1942) is emeritus hoogleraar staats- en bestuursrecht aan de Universiteit van Maastricht, grondlegger van de ‘Maastrichtse school’ en voormalig raadsheer bij de Centrale Raad van Beroep (1984-2011).

image1

Caught in Between Borders
Paul Minderhoud, Sandra Mantu & Karin Zwaan (eds)

"Caught in between borders: citizens, migrants and humans" reflects the fact that the same individual can be a citizen, a migrant or a human being within the same borders and that this categorization can change just like that. This title captures not only the academic fascination of professor Elspeth Guild for borders but also, to a certain extent, the life of Elspeth herself. The book contains 33 scientific contributions by (former) colleagues, PhD students and friends of Elspeth Guild, all of whom have had a special connection with the Centre for Migration Law (CMR). The contributions are divided into five categories: borders, citizens, migrants, asylum and the global compact on migration. They reflect the versatility of the work and interest of professor Elspeth Guild, who was professor of European Migration Law from 2001-2019 at the Faculty of Law of the Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

€ 79.95 Verkrijgbaar via bol.com of uw lokale boekhandel

image1

Direct International Human Rights Obligations of non-State Actors
Nicolás Carrillo-Santarelli

In this book, addressing the reality that non-state actors do violate human rights in practice, which cannot be overlooked, Prof. Nicolás Carrillo-Santarelli argues that the foundations and main principles of international human rights law call for the regulation of direct nonstate obligations and responsibilities, given the potential failure of domestic actions and the limits of voluntary strategies. In part I, the author presents his ideas on why non-state abuses should be regarded as human rights violations and wrongful acts. In this sense, Chapter 1 explores why the protection of human dignity, being non-conditional, cannot depend on the presence of a State abuser. Chapter 2 explores the idea that every conduct contrary to human rights has legal relevance and requires a correlative appropriate legal response. Chapter 3 reinforces the previous ideas in light of the peremptory principle of non-discrimination; with Chapter 4 providing suggestions on when direct international action should take place. Part II, afterwards, studies why direct protection from non-state violations is possible and what legal mechanisms and institutions permit to make it effective. In Chapter 5, the author argues that the notion of international legal personality is not an obstacle since regarding addressees as subjects highlights the possibility of there being direct non-state international duties, which would not weaken existing human rights protections. Chapter 6 presents the argument that there are already implied human rights obligations of non-state actors, and that complementary obligations should be created. Chapter 7 explores the idea that non-state responsibility can coexist with that of other participants in violations, and that non-state responsibility is often a precondition of full reparations. The fi nal Chapter turns to the examination of the mechanisms that can be used to respond to or prevent non-state violations of human rights law. The book is based on the idea that the protagonists of human rights law are individuals, who deserve protection from all abusers, be them States, armed groups, international organizations, or other actors.   Nicolás Carrillo-Santarelli has a PhD in International Law and International Relations from the Autónoma de Madrid University and is currently Associate Professor of International Law at La Sabana University, Colombia.

Recent Publications

image1

Introduction to Law and Rights in Education
Gracienne Lauwers (ed)

Written by an international interdisciplinary consortium, the ‘Introductory Textbook On Law and Rights for Students in Teacher Training and Educational Sciences’ combines information about the features of education systems and education law from a comparative and European perspective for students and readers approaching this subject for the first time with online support. This is a publication by EduLaw. EduLaw introduces modules on law and rights in programmes of teacher training and educational sciences with the purpose to the contribution of building rights-based education systems in countries in transition. This publication is co-funded by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union. 

image1

Legislative Proposal to Introduce Provisions Governing Restorative Justice Services into the Dutch Code of Criminal Procedre and Explanatory Memorandum
Jacques Claessen, John Blad, Gert Jan Slump, Theo de Roos, Anneke van Hoek, Annemieke Wolthuis

This publication contains the revised version of a legislative proposal, drafted by and at the initiative of citizens, to introduce restorative justice provisions into the Dutch Code of Criminal Procedure. The initiative to this Legislative Proposal and its Explanatory Memorandum was taken within the framework of the impending introduction of the new Dutch Code of Criminal Procedure. It was drafted by an Initiator Group consisting of persons working for Maastricht University and the Dutch Restorative Justice Foundation in collaboration with a think tank made up of professionals from the fields of criminal law and restorative justice. This legislative draft was presented to the Minister of Legal Protection, drs S. Dekker, and to the members of the Permanent Commission for Justice and Security of the Lower Chamber on 27 June 2018. The authors feel that the official legislative process can begin in earnest, now that a revised version of the Legislative Proposal has been completed. Being able to deal with criminal matters in a more restorative manner is after all not a luxury, but a necessity.   ‘This initiative has generated an incentive and a standardisation that are of value to an evolving justice practice. The role which this revised version has assigned to the Mediation Offices is in tune with the way in which mediation in criminal cases is organised in the work processes of Public Prosecutors’ Offices and the Courts.”  mr Judith Uitermark - judge and national coordinator mediation in criminal cases. 

€ 9.95 Verkrijgbaar via bol.com of uw lokale boekhandel

image1

Wie ogen heeft om te zien’
Hans Geleijnse

"Hitler's soep zal niet zo heet behoeven gegeten te worden als ze is opgediend" (De Tijd). 
"Wanneer ze eenmaal in de regering zitten, zullen ze wel trachten zich zo behoorlijk mogelijk te gedragen" (Nieuwe Rotterdamsche Courant). 
Zo reageerden belangrijke Nederlandse kranten op de ontwikkelingen in Duitsland vόόr 1933. 
"Wie ogen heeft om te zien' zou echter moeten weten dat het op een moordpartij zal uitdraaien als Hitler aan de macht zal komen (Het Volk). 
Ook over het fascisme in andere landen liepen de meningen in de pers sterk uiteen. Voor sommige kranten was Mussolini "een vredesapostel', volgens andere kranten zou het fascisme onvermijdelijk tot oorlog leiden. 
Hans Geleijnse (1947) analyseert hoe zeven Nederlandse landelijke kranten op de ontwikkeling van het fascisme in Europa in de periode 1919-1933 hebben gereageerd. Werd de Nederlandse lezer goed geinformeerd? Welke aspecten van het fascisme werden geprezen en welke veroordeeld? Werd het fascisme als een gevaar beschouwd voor vrijheid en democratie in Europa? Welke invloed hadden de ontwikkelingen op Nederland zelf?
In dit onderzoek naar de twintiger jaren dringen zich parallellen op met de huidige tijd. Ook nu is sprake van onderschatting van ultra-nationalistische en populistische bewegingen en van het miskennen van de drijfveren van de kiezers. 

"Wie ogen heeft om te zien' geeft een helder beeld van de beoordeling van het fascisme in Italiё, Hongarije, Spanje, Oostenrijk, Duitsland, Roemeniё, Slowakije, Portugal en Finland door De Telegraaf, de liberale Nieuwe Rotterdamsche Courant, het katholieke De Tijd, de antirevolutionaire krant De Standaard, de christelijk-historische De Nederlander, de sociaal-democratische krant Het Volk en de communistische De Tribune. 

€ 24.95 Verkrijgbaar via bol.com of uw lokale boekhandel

webdesign by Robiz.nl Webdesign & Webhosting Oisterwijk